Why Texas Instruments (TI) OMAP (Open Multimedia Application platform) is the Application Processor of Choice?

With the laptop revolution reaching saturation, it is the time for the connected mobile computing in the form of smart phones and MID (mobile internet devices). With high speed mobile internet taken for granted after the advent of 3G and 4G networks, people would like to make full use of the connected computing devices. In this juncture, Application Processor (AP) has a huge market in terms of revenue. Several firms are jumping into the AP market and each company is uniquely placed with their IP in APs. But one company which shows a differentiation in the mobile battery powered devices is the OMAP AP maker Texas Instruments. Having a lion’s share (65%) in this market space, they know what it takes to make a better application processor for battery powered devices. Having introduced the 3rd generation APs and already spinning out powerful 4th generation AP they are better placed with their vast experience in their AP based platform solution for smart phones.
With TI’s competitors simply improving the speed (in simple words: higher the CPU speed, more is the power drain from the battery) of the ARM core without giving any consideration to power management, it is a bad omen for the industry that companies including Apple’s iPhone embrace these platform solution. User experience does include the power management and no user wants to see his phone’s battery drained sooner than his expectation. Here the TI’s unique “heterogeneous core” AP platform solution is standing out in this market space. TI having tightly integrated the ARM core and DSP processor on the same chip (including hardware and it supporting complete embedded software solution includes MM, Graphics, BSP, and Connectivity) have some unique advantageous compared to it s competitor both in terms of power management and CPU speed. DSP which is well suited for all Multimedia related activities is the best to perform all the codec/signal processing related activities compared to ARM both in terms of speed and performance. It is not the simple usage of dedicated DSP that matters here, but it is how it is integrated with the ARM core and made to have a seamless communication with ARM core, which TI does it, best in class.
TI’s solution also adds the additional flexibility of integrating co-processors to buy additional cpu power, if needed. What Intel is trying with its Atom AP is making using of its powerful x86 processor architecture(around 1Ghz) but completely failing in terms of power budget and so is Snapdragon from QCom as well as nVidia's solution making use of Intel's Atom processor with their powerful graphics processor. It is understandable what to expect from a company like Intel with little to no experience in battery powered mobile devices.
The ultimate winner apart from the user experience is better power management. What one can achieve with one heterogeneous core (ARM=700 MHz /DSP =600 MHz) from the TI’s OMAP is manifold than that of its competitors solution. The advantage of having a dedicated DSP to perform all MM related activity is not stopped their. Now you have the idle ARM processor that can be put into use for some other multi-tasking application when the DSP is silently performing the computational intensive MM related activities. Hope iPhone and Blackberry makers seize the potential advantage of the TI’s platform solution over other. It is not always the case “single is powerful” and it is how multiple cores are put into use in computing world. Though the “hardware codecs” are the best in class but you don’t need one when there is an intelligent platform solution like OMAP from TI. Thus apart form the performance it buys some cost benefits to the iPhones and Blackberries makers and thus lessening the burden on to the customer. After all, what the customer wants is a satisfactory max 25-30fps AV playback and recording (includes HD videos), including internet based MM content.

Ideologies of a good CEO

Steve Jobs – The man behind Apple’s success stories

I somehow admire this man and his personality. Not a passive CEO, the kind of what you see in majority companies, where in you don’t know about their mere existence in the company. He makes statements and will successfully stand by it. Such a street smart CEO is what every company needs to present the company’s portfolio before the investors and taking the Wall Street by storm. AAPL’s (used to the stock symbol) marketing model is based on “Drawing its customer base from an unusually artistic, creative, and well-educated population, which may explain the platform’s visibility within certain youthful, avant-garde subcultures.” I was always surprised by the fact how the AAPL’s customer base are so fanatical about their products. They won’t buy similar products manufactured by their competitors for a better price deal even though they have more functionality than AAPL can provide.

The root cause is the user interface and user experience on the gadget is multifold times better than it competitors. They have a very good “human factor research team” to study the functionalities before prototyping the product. Any product doesn’t involve just engineering, it also involve simulation/usability study. Giving the users some prototypes to play with it and list its pluses and minuses. I was amused by the fact the statement made by one of the leading mobile device company CEO (by the way I worked in the company and that was the first town hall conference with the CEO) that who in the hell will by a phone for $ 400 and that too without any key pad. Since users are used to some kind of haptic feedback and touch screen devices cannot provide one. I completely agree with him. But touch screen is not the only innovation Apple’s iPhone has, It has the benefits of full html browser and the apps resembling the desktop kind of feel and experience. FYI, the same company is investing million of dollars in coming with a touch screen product and I was involved in designing and implementing the gesture recognition engine. Its better late than never. I am sure this company on his own can set a benchmark of touch screen devices and take what AAPL has provided one step further.

In one of his recent presentation to Stanford graduates, he said that “He consider every day has the last day in this Earth” Just apply this simple principle in your life then you will understand what all you can accomplish in a given day and what are the risks you are capable of taking confidently in a given day at work. This simple philosophy is really worth a try.

Here is a list of questions answered by Steve on his recent India trip.

What gives Apple that Midas touch?
Somehow that company has it in its DNA to create products that people see as extensions of themselves. I think that this is (points to his Apple notebook) something that makes me more productive and creative.

People view iPods as something that makes them happy and iPhones as products that make people more productive ... even though for a short while with that battery. While the battery is good you are more productive. I think it will be difficult to find someone who says my Vista machine makes me more creative and productive.

It’s hard to imagine that conversation. Having said that Microsoft has 95 per cent marketshare, so maybe that’s why you care about what people say, but that’s the difference.

What part of that ‘specialness’ is Steve Jobs himself?
One hundred and five per cent. Obviously, he has bright people working for him, but he attracts bright people. I don’t know where the company will be without him. In a sense he is to Apple what Lee Kuan Yew is to Singapore.

Can you trace any commonality between revolutionary companies like Apple, Microsoft, and Google?
Yes, the commonality is completely contrary to most people’s idea of venture capital. Which is every one of the mentioned companies had two co-founders who were not proven. They were nerds. So Google was founded by two Phd students in computer science, and Steve was a college dropout.

Bill Gates was also a dropout. It was not like Bill Gates was VP of say Data General and decided to write personal computer software. Looking at these companies, you should invest in unproven teams, in unproven markets, and unproven technologies.

Contrary to what VCs say, which is invest in proven teams, proven markets, and proven technologies. That’s the digital divide.

Every company is on the innovation bandwagon, but why have none of them been able to replicate Apple-style innovation?
Some of this is due to the financial structure. Most of the companies that are publicly traded have to show good financial results in 90 days and most of the innovation cannot take place in the 90 days. And number two -- Apple is a rare exception -- as you grow larger it becomes harder to innovate.

The larger you get, the more the installed base, the more infrastructure you have. There are 26 million people out there saying build a better Macintosh and who are you to say I will build something different.

That’s why it takes a Steve Jobs who doesn’t care -- 26 million people say this, and he goes and builds an iPod. It’s very hard to do.

What stage of the entrepreneurship cycle do you think we in India are?
I haven’t been in India long enough to say. Statistically there should be four Steve Jobs in India because we have 300 million people, and you have 1.2 billion. So there are four Steve Jobs in India. You just have to find them.

A programmer in India shouldn’t want to be just a recipient of American outsourced work. That’s not entrepreneurship. The Indian entrepreneurs should not say I want American outsourced work or I will build an Indian version of Youtube, Flickr, or Twitter. The product should be such that people in Silicon Valley say I am an American version of this thing that they built in India. And I can’t think of any such example.

Who would you blame more for the Internet fiasco in early 2000s, the entrepreneurs or the VCs?
It was no one’s fault. Life is cyclical, it goes through a growth phase and there is a death phase. Not everyone died, right? I would make a call that the world is a better place today because of an amazon.com.

So it was a great biological experiment, most of the life-forms died, but some lived. The ones that survived are doing great. Yes, there was a lot of waste, yes, there was a lot of stupidity but fact is that people can now say that pets.com was a stupid idea. I will tell you that when people were starting Yahoo, Google, and Cisco, somebody was saying that’s a stupid idea.

So it’s very easy for us to say what went wrong now. A very good example is Webvan (a defunct Web grocery business); now we can say it was a bad idea of supplying celery to the doorstep and that $200 million went down the drain.

Sitting here I can tell you it’s a flip of a coin whether Webvan was going to be a success or not. We could easily be saying that Webvan changed the world. So the message is you just don’t know. Since you don’t know you as an entrepreneur can try and if you fail you fail.

What’s your take on Web 2.0?
I don’t know what that means. People call me to attend Web 3.0 conferences and I tell them I don’t know what even 2.0 is.

My comment to these kinds of labels is that I don’t think that any customer wakes up in the morning and says I need a Web 2.0 application. They may say I need something to balance my cheque-book, I need something to manage my inventory, I need to create a personal profile. I can understand that; but nobody wakes up and says I want a Web 2.0 experience today.

What are the few steps that an entrepreneur should get right?
Prototyping is the first thing. That’s the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth thing. The sixth thing is to write a business plan. And don’t even think of the exit plans, it’s a joke. Statistically, the logical exit plan is bankruptcy.

Entrepreneurs should focus on the prototype because a prototype will tell you whether people will use the product/service or not. It proves to the investor whether you are serious or not. It enables you to find out whether customers want it or not. Prototype is the key, not the business plan and definitely not the research either.

A lot of companies seem to be promoting the concept of Intrapreneurs aggressively and it hasn’t lead to something very substantial. What seems to be the problem?
Some of it works. In the US, when people talk about great examples of intrapreneurship; one of the most cited examples is 3M sticky notes.

But that was 30 years ago. Tell me that in last 30 years all you have is stickies. It’s not easy. For all factors, in a publicly traded large company all that the sales force hears from the customers is that we want better, faster, cheaper existing products.

So, in a sense you don’t have to listen to your customers, they will always ask for better, faster, cheaper products. No one will say I am an Apple II customer, create something that that will make my existing product obsolete. Nobody says that ... and that’s why it’s hard to jump curves for companies.

A practical problem that entrepreneurs face is too much advice. VC’s, peers, bloggers, i-bankers , everyone is doling out advice. How does one segregate bad advice from the good?
As a general rule of thumb do the opposite of what a venture capitalist says. If he says go for marketshare, do the opposite. If he says build infrastructure because you need to service your best customers better; don’t.

You will end up spending precious dollars on IT staff and other things. If the VC says outsource to Bangalore; do it internally. Generally speaking, it’s pretty good advice to do the opposite of what VCs tell you.

Why am I here?

This is my first blog. Long wanted to express my ideas through some window and I felt this tool will help me to express myself. It has been my nonage fantasy to think about science and have compiled my thoughts in a notebook. Felt, it is time to share my thoughts through this window and get appropriate comments.
The ideas might look stupid, but felt rather than sharing the thoughts, by hiding it in secrecy I am doing a greatest disservice to science. I will start adding in my ideas as and when I get time.
Thanks for any comments you are going to leave here. This will certainly help in the upliftment of Science. My inspiration for all my ideas is none other than Einstein and his simple equation that deciphered the nature (E=mc^2)
Hope I will be welcomed to the world of blogging.